Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(6): 687-713, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2185241

RESUMEN

The purpose of this document is to highlight practical recommendations to assist acute care hospitals to prioritize and implement strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), ventilator-associated events (VAE), and non-ventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia (NV-HAP) in adults, children, and neonates. This document updates the Strategies to Prevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Acute Care Hospitals published in 2014. This expert guidance document is sponsored by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology (SHEA), and is the product of a collaborative effort led by SHEA, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the American Hospital Association, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, and The Joint Commission, with major contributions from representatives of a number of organizations and societies with content expertise.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador , Neumonía , Adulto , Niño , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/prevención & control , Hospitales , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Control de Infecciones , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Ventiladores Mecánicos/efectos adversos
3.
Eur Geriatr Med ; 12(5): 1045-1055, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1474202

RESUMEN

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of multi-component interventions for prevention of hospital-acquired pneumonia in older patients hospitalized in geriatric wards. METHODS: A randomized, parallel-group, controlled trial was undertaken in patients aged 65 and above who were admitted to a tertiary hospital geriatric unit from January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2018 for an acute non-respiratory illness. Participants were randomized by to receive either a multi-component intervention (consisting of reverse Trendelenburg position, dysphagia screening, oral care and vaccinations), or usual care. The outcome measures were the proportion of patients who developed hospital-acquired pneumonia during hospitalisation, and mean time from randomization to the next hospitalisation due to respiratory infections in 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 123 participants (median age, 85; 43.1% male) were randomized, (n = 59) to intervention group and (n = 64) to control group. The multi-component interventions did not significantly reduce the incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia but did increase the mean time to next hospitalisation due to respiratory infection (11.5 months vs. 9.5 months; P = 0.049), and reduced the risk of hospitalisation in 1 year (18.6% vs. 34.4%; P = 0.049). Implementation of multi-component interventions increased diagnoses of oropharyngeal dysphagia (35.6% vs. 20.3%; P < 0.001) and improved the influenza (54.5% vs 17.2%; P < 0.001) and pneumococcal vaccination rates (52.5% vs. 20.3%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The nosocomial pneumonia multi-component intervention did not significantly reduce the incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia during hospitalisation but reduce subsequent hospitalisations for respiratory infections. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT04347395.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infección Hospitalaria , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Femenino , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Am J Infect Control ; 50(1): 116-119, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1318820

RESUMEN

Among 1,635,711 Veteran acute care admissions (FY2016-2020), the risk of non-ventilator associated hospital acquired pneumonia (NV-HAP) was 1.26 cases per 1,000 hospitalized days and decreased linearly over time with an uptick in cases in the last year coinciding with the onset of the covid-19 pandemic. Veterans who develop NV-HAP experience remarkably higher 30-day and 1-year mortality, longer length of stay, and higher rates of inpatient sepsis. Monitoring and prevention measures may substantially reduce negative outcomes.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infección Hospitalaria , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador , Neumonía , Veteranos , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Pandemias , Neumonía/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2
5.
J Med Virol ; 93(7): 4564-4569, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1263107

RESUMEN

Adverse outcomes in coronavirus infection disease-19 (COVID-19) patients are not always due to the direct effects of the viral infection, but often due to bacterial coinfection. However, the risk factors for such bacterial coinfection are hitherto unknown. A case-control study was conducted to determine risk factors for bacterial infection in moderate to critical COVID-19. Out of a total of 50 cases and 50 controls, the proportion of cases with severe/critical disease at presentation was 80% in cases compared to 30% in controls (p < 0.001). The predominant site was hospital-acquired pneumonia (72%) and the majority were Gram-negative organisms (82%). The overall mortality was 30%, with comparatively higher mortality among cases (42% vs. 18%; p = 0.009). There was no difference between procalcitonin levels in both groups (p = 0.883). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, significant independent association was found with severe/critical COVID-19 at presentation (AOR: 4.42 times; 95% CI: 1.63-11.9) and use of steroids (AOR: 4.60; 95% CI: 1.24-17.05). Notably, 64% of controls were administered antibiotics despite the absence of bacterial coinfection or secondary infection. Risk factors for bacterial infections in moderate to critically ill patients with COVID-19 include critical illness at presentation and use of steroids. There is widespread empiric antibiotic utilization in those without bacterial infection.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , COVID-19/patología , Coinfección/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Anciano , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Infecciones Bacterianas/complicaciones , COVID-19/etiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Coinfección/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pakistán/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 51(2): e13458, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1066670

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent trials with dexamethasone and hydrocortisone have demonstrated benefit in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Data on methylprednisolone are limited. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of consecutive adults with severe COVID-19 pneumonia on high-flow oxygen (FiO2  ≥ 50%) admitted to an academic centre in New York, from 1 March to 15 April 2020. We used inverse probability of treatment weights to estimate the effect of methylprednisolone on clinical outcomes and intensive care resource utilization. RESULTS: Of 447 patients, 153 (34.2%) received methylprednisolone and 294 (65.8%) received no corticosteroids. At 28 days, 102 patients (22.8%) had died and 115 (25.7%) received mechanical ventilation. In weighted analyses, risk for death or mechanical ventilation was 37% lower with methylprednisolone (hazard ratio 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.86; P = .003), driven by less frequent mechanical ventilation (subhazard ratio 0.56; 95% CI 0.40-0.79; P = .001); mortality did not differ between groups. The methylprednisolone group had 2.8 more ventilator-free days (95% CI 0.5-5.1; P = .017) and 2.6 more intensive care-free days (95% CI 0.2-4.9; P = .033) during the first 28 days. Complication rates were not higher with methylprednisolone. CONCLUSIONS: In nonintubated patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, methylprednisolone was associated with reduced need for mechanical ventilation and less-intensive care resource utilization without excess complications.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Metilprednisolona/administración & dosificación , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/fisiopatología , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
7.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 7(1)2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-733150

RESUMEN

Invasive mechanical has been associated with high mortality in COVID-19. Alternative therapy of high flow nasal therapy (HFNT) has been greatly debated around the world for use in COVID-19 pandemic due to concern for increased healthcare worker transmission.This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients admitted to Temple University Hospital in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, from 10 March 2020 to 24 April 2020 with moderate-to-severe respiratory failure treated with HFNT. Primary outcome was prevention of intubation. Of the 445 patients with COVID-19, 104 met our inclusion criteria. The average age was 60.66 (+13.50) years, 49 (47.12 %) were female, 53 (50.96%) were African-American, 23 (22.12%) Hispanic. Forty-three patients (43.43%) were smokers. Saturation to fraction ratio and chest X-ray scores had a statistically significant improvement from day 1 to day 7. 67 of 104 (64.42%) were able to avoid invasive mechanical ventilation in our cohort. Incidence of hospital-associated/ventilator-associated pneumonia was 2.9%. Overall, mortality was 14.44% (n=15) in our cohort with 13 (34.4%) in the progressed to intubation group and 2 (2.9%) in the non-intubation group. Mortality and incidence of pneumonia was statistically higher in the progressed to intubation group. CONCLUSION: HFNT use is associated with a reduction in the rate of invasive mechanical ventilation and overall mortality in patients with COVID-19 infection.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Hipoxia/terapia , Intubación Intratraqueal/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Negro o Afroamericano , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Cánula , Comorbilidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Femenino , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Philadelphia/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Quimioterapia por Pulso , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Fumar/epidemiología , Población Blanca
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA